[PATCH 6.6 053/139] s390: Mark psw in __load_psw_mask() as __unitialized

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.6-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 7278a8fb8d032dfdc03d9b5d17e0bc451cdc1492 ]

Without __unitialized, the following code is generated when
INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO is enabled:

86: d7 0f f0 a0 f0 a0     xc      160(16,%r15), 160(%r15)
8c: e3 40 f0 a0 00 24     stg     %r4, 160(%r15)
92: c0 10 00 00 00 08     larl    %r1, 0xa2
98: e3 10 f0 a8 00 24     stg     %r1, 168(%r15)
9e: b2 b2 f0 a0           lpswe   160(%r15)

The xc is not adding any security because psw is fully initialized
with the following instructions. Add __unitialized to the psw
definitiation to avoid the superfluous clearing of psw.

Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h
index dc17896a001a9..e7338ed540d8f 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -308,8 +308,8 @@ static inline void __load_psw(psw_t psw)
  */
 static __always_inline void __load_psw_mask(unsigned long mask)
 {
+	psw_t psw __uninitialized;
 	unsigned long addr;
-	psw_t psw;
 
 	psw.mask = mask;
 
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux