5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit f921a58ae20852d188f70842431ce6519c4fdc36 ] If one TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_PRIOMAP attribute has been provided, taprio_parse_mqprio_opt() must validate it, or userspace can inject arbitrary data to the kernel, the second time taprio_change() is called. First call (with valid attributes) sets dev->num_tc to a non zero value. Second call (with arbitrary mqprio attributes) returns early from taprio_parse_mqprio_opt() and bad things can happen. Fixes: a3d43c0d56f1 ("taprio: Add support adding an admin schedule") Reported-by: Noam Rathaus <noamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@xxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240604181511.769870-1-edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 15 ++++++--------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c index e40b4425eb6b5..4a0986843fb5d 100644 --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c @@ -947,16 +947,13 @@ static int taprio_parse_mqprio_opt(struct net_device *dev, { int i, j; - if (!qopt && !dev->num_tc) { - NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "'mqprio' configuration is necessary"); - return -EINVAL; - } - - /* If num_tc is already set, it means that the user already - * configured the mqprio part - */ - if (dev->num_tc) + if (!qopt) { + if (!dev->num_tc) { + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "'mqprio' configuration is necessary"); + return -EINVAL; + } return 0; + } /* Verify num_tc is not out of max range */ if (qopt->num_tc > TC_MAX_QUEUE) { -- 2.43.0