[PATCH 5.10 106/290] rcutorture: Fix rcu_torture_one_read() pipe_count overflow comment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



5.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 8b9b443fa860276822b25057cb3ff3b28734dec0 ]

The "pipe_count > RCU_TORTURE_PIPE_LEN" check has a comment saying "Should
not happen, but...".  This is only true when testing an RCU whose grace
periods are always long enough.  This commit therefore fixes this comment.

Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wi7rJ-eGq+xaxVfzFEgbL9tdf6Kc8Z89rCpfcQOKm74Tw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index 6c1aea48a79a1..c413eb4a95667 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -1407,7 +1407,8 @@ static bool rcu_torture_one_read(struct torture_random_state *trsp)
 	preempt_disable();
 	pipe_count = READ_ONCE(p->rtort_pipe_count);
 	if (pipe_count > RCU_TORTURE_PIPE_LEN) {
-		/* Should not happen, but... */
+		// Should not happen in a correct RCU implementation,
+		// happens quite often for torture_type=busted.
 		pipe_count = RCU_TORTURE_PIPE_LEN;
 	}
 	completed = cur_ops->get_gp_seq();
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux