6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 3ac36aa7307363b7247ccb6f6a804e11496b2b36 ]
memblock_set_node() warns about using MAX_NUMNODES, see
e0eec24e2e19 ("memblock: make memblock_set_node() also warn about use of MAX_NUMNODES")
for details.
Reported-by: Narasimhan V <Narasimhan.V@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[bp: commit message]
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240603141005.23261-1-bp@xxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/abadb736-a239-49e4-ab42-ace7acdd4278@xxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index c7fa5396c0f05..c281326baa144 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static void __init numa_clear_kernel_node_hotplug(void)
for_each_reserved_mem_region(mb_region) {
int nid = memblock_get_region_node(mb_region);
- if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES)
+ if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE)
node_set(nid, reserved_nodemask);
}
@@ -643,9 +643,9 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
nodes_clear(node_online_map);
memset(&numa_meminfo, 0, sizeof(numa_meminfo));
WARN_ON(memblock_set_node(0, ULLONG_MAX, &memblock.memory,
- MAX_NUMNODES));
+ NUMA_NO_NODE));
WARN_ON(memblock_set_node(0, ULLONG_MAX, &memblock.reserved,
- MAX_NUMNODES));
+ NUMA_NO_NODE));
/* In case that parsing SRAT failed. */
WARN_ON(memblock_clear_hotplug(0, ULLONG_MAX));
numa_reset_distance();
--
2.43.0
