6.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit fdc69d39e77f88264ee6e8174ff9aaf0953aecd9 ] The SVA code is wired to assume that the SVA is programmed onto the mm->pasid. The current core code always does this, so it is fine. Add a check for clarity. Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3-v6-228e7adf25eb+4155-smmuv3_newapi_p2_jgg@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c index 2cd433a9c8a0f..41b44baef15e8 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c @@ -569,6 +569,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_sva_set_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain, int ret = 0; struct mm_struct *mm = domain->mm; + if (mm_get_enqcmd_pasid(mm) != id) + return -EINVAL; + mutex_lock(&sva_lock); ret = __arm_smmu_sva_bind(dev, id, mm); mutex_unlock(&sva_lock); -- 2.43.0
