On Mon, 01 Jul 2024 11:56:57 +0100, "Gowans, James" <jgowans@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 2023-07-23 at 22:41 +0200, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > Blast from the past, but we've recently been bitten by this bug when > running a v5.10 kernel. I'm going to back-port it to v5.10 and v5.15, > resolve the conflicts and post it. > > Marc, please will you take a look and see if you're happy with the > backport? The main change is going back to the old style of vCPU flag > manipulation. Thanks for having a stab at this. I eyeballed the two patches, and couldn't see anything untoward. However, I haven't tested them, as life is too short to run prehistoric kernels ;-). M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
