FAILED: patch "[PATCH] usb: musb: core: make sure musb is in RPM_ACTIVE on resume" failed to apply to 3.18-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch below does not apply to the 3.18-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

>From a1fc1920aaaaeadc7cf9d80fc16e6b8eca722b44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:33:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] usb: musb: core: make sure musb is in RPM_ACTIVE on resume

On am335x-evm with musb in host mode and using it as a wakeup source the
following happens once the CPU comes out of suspend to ram:
|PM: Wakeup source MPU_WAKE
|PM: noirq resume of devices complete after 15.453 msecs
|PM: early resume of devices complete after 2.222 msecs
|PM: resume of devices complete after 507.351 msecs
|Restarting tasks ...
|------------[ cut here ]------------
|WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 322 at drivers/usb/core/urb.c:339 usb_submit_urb+0x494/0x4c8()
|URB cc0db380 submitted while active
|[<c0348e64>] (usb_submit_urb) from [<c0340f94>] (hub_activate+0x2b8/0x49c)
|[<c0340f94>] (hub_activate) from [<c03411dc>] (hub_resume+0x14/0x1c)
|[<c03411dc>] (hub_resume) from [<c034be10>] (usb_resume_interface.isra.4+0xdc/0x110)
|[<c034be10>] (usb_resume_interface.isra.4) from [<c034beb0>] (usb_resume_both+0x6c/0x13c)
|[<c034beb0>] (usb_resume_both) from [<c034cca4>] (usb_runtime_resume+0x10/0x14)
|[<c034cca4>] (usb_runtime_resume) from [<c02bbd80>] (__rpm_callback+0x2c/0x60)
|[<c02bbd80>] (__rpm_callback) from [<c02bbdd4>] (rpm_callback+0x20/0x74)
|[<c02bbdd4>] (rpm_callback) from [<c02bcc48>] (rpm_resume+0x380/0x548)
|[<c02bcc48>] (rpm_resume) from [<c02bcb00>] (rpm_resume+0x238/0x548)
|[<c02bcb00>] (rpm_resume) from [<c02bd08c>] (__pm_runtime_resume+0x64/0x94)
|[<c02bd08c>] (__pm_runtime_resume) from [<c034b5a4>] (usb_autopm_get_interface+0x18/0x5c)
|[<c034b5a4>] (usb_autopm_get_interface) from [<c03438b8>] (hub_thread+0x10c/0x115c)
|[<c03438b8>] (hub_thread) from [<c005a70c>] (kthread+0xbc/0xd8)
|---[ end trace 036aa5fe78203142 ]---
|hub 1-0:1.0: activate --> -16
|hub 2-0:1.0: activate --> -16

The reason for this backtrace is the attempt of the USB code to resume
the HUB twice and thus enqueue the status URB twice.
Alan Stern was a great help by explaining how the USB code supposed to
work and what is most likely the problem. The root problem is that after
resume the musb runtime-suspend state remains RPM_SUSPENDED.
According to git log it RPM was added for the omap2430 platform. If I
understand it correct the omap2430 invokes a get on musb once a cable is
connected and a put once the cable is gone. In between the device could
go auto-idle/off. Not sure what happens when the device goes into suspend
but then I guess it was gadget only.
On DSPS I see only a get in probe and put in remove function. This would
forbid RPM from working but then the devices enterns suspended state
anyway :)

To get rid of this warning, I set the device state to RPM_ACTIVE which
the expected state.

Cc: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
index 3345c945262f..f1dfe53515fb 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c
@@ -2321,6 +2321,14 @@ static int musb_resume(struct device *dev)
 		schedule_delayed_work(&musb->finish_resume_work,
 				      msecs_to_jiffies(20));
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * The USB HUB code expects the device to be in RPM_ACTIVE once it came
+	 * out of suspend
+	 */
+	pm_runtime_disable(dev);
+	pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
+	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
 	return 0;
 }
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]