6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Su Hui <suhui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 91215f70ea8541e9011c0b48f8b59b9e0ce6953b ]
Clang static checker (scan-build) warning:
o_uring/io-wq.c:line 1051, column 3
The expression is an uninitialized value. The computed value will
also be garbage.
'match.nr_pending' is used in io_acct_cancel_pending_work(), but it is
not fully initialized. Change the order of assignment for 'match' to fix
this problem.
Fixes: 42abc95f05bf ("io-wq: decouple work_list protection from the big wqe->lock")
Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240604121242.2661244-1-suhui@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
io_uring/io-wq.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_uring/io-wq.c b/io_uring/io-wq.c
index 4a07742349048..8a99aabcac2c3 100644
--- a/io_uring/io-wq.c
+++ b/io_uring/io-wq.c
@@ -929,7 +929,11 @@ void io_wq_enqueue(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wq_work *work)
{
struct io_wq_acct *acct = io_work_get_acct(wq, work);
unsigned long work_flags = work->flags;
- struct io_cb_cancel_data match;
+ struct io_cb_cancel_data match = {
+ .fn = io_wq_work_match_item,
+ .data = work,
+ .cancel_all = false,
+ };
bool do_create;
/*
@@ -967,10 +971,6 @@ void io_wq_enqueue(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wq_work *work)
raw_spin_unlock(&wq->lock);
/* fatal condition, failed to create the first worker */
- match.fn = io_wq_work_match_item,
- match.data = work,
- match.cancel_all = false,
-
io_acct_cancel_pending_work(wq, acct, &match);
}
}
--
2.43.0
