From: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@xxxxxxxxx> It seems I introduced it together with TCP_AO_CMDF_AO_REQUIRED, on version 5 [1] of TCP-AO patches. Quite frustrative that having all these selftests that I've written, running kmemtest & kcov was always in todo. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230215183335.800122-5-dima@xxxxxxxxxx/ Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240617072451.1403e1d2@xxxxxxxxxx/ Fixes: 0aadc73995d0 ("net/tcp: Prevent TCP-MD5 with TCP-AO being set") Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@xxxxxxxxx> --- net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c index 37c42b63ff99..09c0fa6756b7 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c @@ -1968,8 +1968,10 @@ static int tcp_ao_info_cmd(struct sock *sk, unsigned short int family, first = true; } - if (cmd.ao_required && tcp_ao_required_verify(sk)) - return -EKEYREJECTED; + if (cmd.ao_required && tcp_ao_required_verify(sk)) { + err = -EKEYREJECTED; + goto out; + } /* For sockets in TCP_CLOSED it's possible set keys that aren't * matching the future peer (address/port/VRF/etc), --- base-commit: 92e5605a199efbaee59fb19e15d6cc2103a04ec2 change-id: 20240619-tcp-ao-required-leak-22b4a9b6d743 Best regards, -- Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@xxxxxxxxx>
