5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 77c67530e1f95ac25c7075635f32f04367380894 ]
nfsd currently doesn't access i_flctx safely everywhere. This requires a
smp_load_acquire, as the pointer is set via cmpxchg (a release
operation).
Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 10915c72c7815..2d09977fee83d 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -4773,7 +4773,7 @@ nfs4_share_conflict(struct svc_fh *current_fh, unsigned int deny_type)
static bool nfsd4_deleg_present(const struct inode *inode)
{
- struct file_lock_context *ctx = smp_load_acquire(&inode->i_flctx);
+ struct file_lock_context *ctx = locks_inode_context(inode);
return ctx && !list_empty_careful(&ctx->flc_lease);
}
@@ -5912,7 +5912,7 @@ nfs4_lockowner_has_blockers(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo)
list_for_each_entry(stp, &lo->lo_owner.so_stateids, st_perstateowner) {
nf = stp->st_stid.sc_file;
- ctx = nf->fi_inode->i_flctx;
+ ctx = locks_inode_context(nf->fi_inode);
if (!ctx)
continue;
if (locks_owner_has_blockers(ctx, lo))
@@ -7740,7 +7740,7 @@ check_for_locks(struct nfs4_file *fp, struct nfs4_lockowner *lowner)
}
inode = locks_inode(nf->nf_file);
- flctx = inode->i_flctx;
+ flctx = locks_inode_context(inode);
if (flctx && !list_empty_careful(&flctx->flc_posix)) {
spin_lock(&flctx->flc_lock);
--
2.43.0
