5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit d19a7af73b5ecaac8168712d18be72b9db166768 ]
In my testing, we're sometimes hitting the request->fl_flags & FL_EXISTS
case in posix_lock_inode, presumably just by random luck since we're not
actually initializing fl_flags here.
This probably didn't matter before commit 7f024fcd5c97 ("Keep read and
write fds with each nlm_file") since we wouldn't previously unlock
unless we knew there were locks.
But now it causes lockd to give up on removing more locks.
We could just initialize fl_flags, but really it seems dubious to be
calling vfs_lock_file with random values in some of the fields.
Fixes: 7f024fcd5c97 ("Keep read and write fds with each nlm_file")
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ cel: fixed checkpatch.pl nit ]
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/lockd/svcsubs.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c b/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c
index 54c2e42130ca2..0a22a2faf5522 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c
@@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ static int nlm_unlock_files(struct nlm_file *file)
{
struct file_lock lock;
+ locks_init_lock(&lock);
lock.fl_type = F_UNLCK;
lock.fl_start = 0;
lock.fl_end = OFFSET_MAX;
--
2.43.0
