5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit b661601a9fdf1af8516e1100de8bba84bd41cca4 ] Update comment to reflect that we *do* allow reexport, whether it's a good idea or not.... Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/lockd/svcsubs.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c b/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c index e02951f8a28f5..13e6ffc219ec9 100644 --- a/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c +++ b/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c @@ -111,8 +111,9 @@ nlm_lookup_file(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file **result, INIT_HLIST_NODE(&file->f_list); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&file->f_blocks); - /* Open the file. Note that this must not sleep for too long, else - * we would lock up lockd:-) So no NFS re-exports, folks. + /* + * Open the file. Note that if we're reexporting, for example, + * this could block the lockd thread for a while. * * We have to make sure we have the right credential to open * the file. -- 2.43.0
