5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 33311873adb0d55c287b164117b5b4bb7b1bdc40 ] This STALE_CLIENTID check is redundant with the one in lookup_clientid(). There's a difference in behavior is in case of memory allocation failure, which I think isn't a big deal. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c index e7ec7593eaaa3..3f26047376368 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c @@ -4722,8 +4722,6 @@ nfsd4_process_open1(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, struct nfs4_openowner *oo = NULL; __be32 status; - if (STALE_CLIENTID(&open->op_clientid, nn)) - return nfserr_stale_clientid; /* * In case we need it later, after we've already created the * file and don't want to risk a further failure: -- 2.43.0
