Re: [PATCH 5.15.y] iommu/dma: Trace bounce buffer usage when mapping buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 6/13/2024 4:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 04:01:01PM +0530, Bibek Kumar Patro wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 12:37:54PM -0800, Isaac J. Manjarres wrote:
When commit 82612d66d51d ("iommu: Allow the dma-iommu api to
use bounce buffers") was introduced, it did not add the logic
for tracing the bounce buffer usage from iommu_dma_map_page().

All of the users of swiotlb_tbl_map_single() trace their bounce
buffer usage, except iommu_dma_map_page(). This makes it difficult
to track SWIOTLB usage from that function. Thus, trace bounce buffer
usage from iommu_dma_map_page().

Fixes: 82612d66d51d ("iommu: Allow the dma-iommu api to use bounce buffers")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v5.15+
Cc: Tom Murphy <murphyt7@xxxxxx>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208234141.2356157-1-isaacmanjarres@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx>
(cherry picked from commit a63c357b9fd56ad5fe64616f5b22835252c6a76a)
Signed-off-by: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacmanjarres@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
index 48c6f7ff4aef..8cd63e6ccd2c 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
  #include <linux/crash_dump.h>
  #include <linux/dma-direct.h>
+#include <trace/events/swiotlb.h>
struct iommu_dma_msi_page {
  	struct list_head	list;
@@ -817,6 +818,8 @@ static dma_addr_t iommu_dma_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
  		void *padding_start;
  		size_t padding_size, aligned_size;
+ trace_swiotlb_bounced(dev, phys, size, swiotlb_force);
+

Hi, this backported patch trying to access swiotlb_force variable is
causing a build conflict where CONFIG_SWIOTLB is not enabled.

In file included from kernel/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c:28:
kernel/include/trace/events/swiotlb.h:15:9: error: declaration of 'enum SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE' will not be visible outside of this function [-Werror,-Wvisibility]
                  enum swiotlb_force swiotlb_force),
                       ^
kernel/include/linux/swiotlb.h:143:23: note: expanded from macro 'swiotlb_force'
#define swiotlb_force SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE
                       ^
In file included from kernel/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c:28:
kernel/include/trace/events/swiotlb.h:15:9: error: declaration of 'enum SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE' will not be visible outside of this function [-Werror,-Wvisibility]
kernel/include/linux/swiotlb.h:143:23: note: expanded from macro 'swiotlb_force'
#define swiotlb_force SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE
                       ^
In file included from kernel/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c:28:
kernel/include/trace/events/swiotlb.h:15:9: error: declaration of 'enum SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE' will not be visible outside of this function [-Werror,-Wvisibility]
kernel/include/linux/swiotlb.h:143:23: note: expanded from macro 'swiotlb_force'
#define swiotlb_force SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE
                       ^
In file included from kernel/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c:28:
kernel/include/trace/events/swiotlb.h:15:9: error: declaration of 'enum SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE' will not be visible outside of this function [-Werror,-Wvisibility]
kernel/include/linux/swiotlb.h:143:23: note: expanded from macro 'swiotlb_force'
#define swiotlb_force SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE
                       ^
kernel/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c:865:42: error: argument type 'enum SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE' is incomplete
                                        trace_swiotlb_bounced(dev, phys, size, swiotlb_force);
                                                                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/include/linux/swiotlb.h:143:23: note: expanded from macro 'swiotlb_force'
#define swiotlb_force SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE
                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/include/trace/events/swiotlb.h:15:9: note: forward declaration of 'enum SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE'
enum swiotlb_force swiotlb_force),
      ^
kernel/include/linux/swiotlb.h:143:23: note: expanded from macro 'swiotlb_force'
#define swiotlb_force SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have a simple proposed fix which can resolve this compile time conflict when CONFIG_SWIOTLB is disabled.

--- a/include/trace/events/swiotlb.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/swiotlb.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@

  #include <linux/tracepoint.h>

+#ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
  TRACE_EVENT(swiotlb_bounced,

         TP_PROTO(struct device *dev,
@@ -43,6 +44,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(swiotlb_bounced,
                         { SWIOTLB_FORCE,        "FORCE" },
                         { SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE,     "NO_FORCE" }))
  );
+#else
+#define trace_swiotlb_bounced(dev, phys, size, swiotlb_force)
+#endif /* CONFIG_SWIOTLB */

  #endif /*  _TRACE_SWIOTLB_H */



Why not just take whatever change upstream fixes this instead of a
one-off change?


I am currently checking the history on swiotlb_force and how it's
removed in latest kernel versions. If those changes are applicable on
this stable branch can we explore backporting those instead of this one-
off change ?

Thanks & regards,
Bibek

thanks

greg k-h




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux