5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Matthew Bystrin <dev.mbstr@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit a2a4d4a6a0bf5eba66f8b0b32502cc20d82715a0 ]
If the load access fault occures in a leaf function (with
CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y), when wrong stack trace will be displayed:
[<ffffffff804853c2>] regmap_mmio_read32le+0xe/0x1c
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Registers dump:
ra 0xffffffff80485758 <regmap_mmio_read+36>
sp 0xffffffc80200b9a0
fp 0xffffffc80200b9b0
pc 0xffffffff804853ba <regmap_mmio_read32le+6>
Stack dump:
0xffffffc80200b9a0: 0xffffffc80200b9e0 0xffffffc80200b9e0
0xffffffc80200b9b0: 0xffffffff8116d7e8 0x0000000000000100
0xffffffc80200b9c0: 0xffffffd8055b9400 0xffffffd8055b9400
0xffffffc80200b9d0: 0xffffffc80200b9f0 0xffffffff8047c526
0xffffffc80200b9e0: 0xffffffc80200ba30 0xffffffff8047fe9a
The assembler dump of the function preambula:
add sp,sp,-16
sd s0,8(sp)
add s0,sp,16
In the fist stack frame, where ra is not stored on the stack we can
observe:
0(sp) 8(sp)
.---------------------------------------------.
sp->| frame->fp | frame->ra (saved fp) |
|---------------------------------------------|
fp->| .... | .... |
|---------------------------------------------|
| | |
and in the code check is performed:
if (regs && (regs->epc == pc) && (frame->fp & 0x7))
I see no reason to check frame->fp value at all, because it is can be
uninitialized value on the stack. A better way is to check frame->ra to
be an address on the stack. After the stacktrace shows as expect:
[<ffffffff804853c2>] regmap_mmio_read32le+0xe/0x1c
[<ffffffff80485758>] regmap_mmio_read+0x24/0x52
[<ffffffff8047c526>] _regmap_bus_reg_read+0x1a/0x22
[<ffffffff8047fe9a>] _regmap_read+0x5c/0xea
[<ffffffff80480376>] _regmap_update_bits+0x76/0xc0
...
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
As pointed by Samuel Holland it is incorrect to remove check of the stackframe
entirely.
Changes since v2 [2]:
- Add accidentally forgotten curly brace
Changes since v1 [1]:
- Instead of just dropping frame->fp check, replace it with validation of
frame->ra, which should be a stack address.
- Move frame pointer validation into the separate function.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240426072701.6463-1-dev.mbstr@xxxxxxxxx/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240521131314.48895-1-dev.mbstr@xxxxxxxxx/
Fixes: f766f77a74f5 ("riscv/stacktrace: Fix stack output without ra on the stack top")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Bystrin <dev.mbstr@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240521191727.62012-1-dev.mbstr@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 26f3916eea47c..94721c484d638 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -20,6 +20,16 @@ register unsigned long sp_in_global __asm__("sp");
extern asmlinkage void ret_from_exception(void);
+static inline int fp_is_valid(unsigned long fp, unsigned long sp)
+{
+ unsigned long low, high;
+
+ low = sp + sizeof(struct stackframe);
+ high = ALIGN(sp, THREAD_SIZE);
+
+ return !(fp < low || fp > high || fp & 0x07);
+}
+
void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *arg)
{
@@ -43,21 +53,19 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
}
for (;;) {
- unsigned long low, high;
struct stackframe *frame;
if (unlikely(!__kernel_text_address(pc) || (level++ >= 0 && !fn(arg, pc))))
break;
- /* Validate frame pointer */
- low = sp + sizeof(struct stackframe);
- high = ALIGN(sp, THREAD_SIZE);
- if (unlikely(fp < low || fp > high || fp & 0x7))
+ if (unlikely(!fp_is_valid(fp, sp)))
break;
+
/* Unwind stack frame */
frame = (struct stackframe *)fp - 1;
sp = fp;
- if (regs && (regs->epc == pc) && (frame->fp & 0x7)) {
+ if (regs && (regs->epc == pc) && fp_is_valid(frame->ra, sp)) {
+ /* We hit function where ra is not saved on the stack */
fp = frame->ra;
pc = regs->ra;
} else {
--
2.43.0
