5.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 48c0687a322d54ac7e7a685c0b6db78d78f593af ]
The output voltage is inclusive hence the max level calculation is
off-by-one-step. Correct it.
iWhile we are at it also add a define for the step size instead of
using the magic value.
Fixes: 11205bb63e5c ("Input: add support for pm8xxx based vibrator driver")
Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412-pm8xxx-vibrator-new-design-v10-1-0ec0ad133866@xxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
index 53ad25eaf1a28..8bfe5c7b1244c 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@
#define VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV (3100)
#define VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV (1200)
-#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV)
+#define VIB_PER_STEP_mV (100)
+#define VIB_MAX_LEVELS (VIB_MAX_LEVEL_mV - VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV + VIB_PER_STEP_mV)
#define MAX_FF_SPEED 0xff
@@ -118,10 +119,10 @@ static void pm8xxx_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
vib->active = true;
vib->level = ((VIB_MAX_LEVELS * vib->speed) / MAX_FF_SPEED) +
VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV;
- vib->level /= 100;
+ vib->level /= VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
} else {
vib->active = false;
- vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV / 100;
+ vib->level = VIB_MIN_LEVEL_mV / VIB_PER_STEP_mV;
}
pm8xxx_vib_set(vib, vib->active);
--
2.43.0
