The hugetlb_cma code passes 0 in the order_per_bit argument to cma_declare_contiguous_nid (the alignment, computed using the page order, is correctly passed in). This causes a bit in the cma allocation bitmap to always represent a 4k page, making the bitmaps potentially very large, and slower. It would create bitmaps that would be pretty big. E.g. for a 4k page size on x86, hugetlb_cma=64G would mean a bitmap size of (64G / 4k) / 8 == 2M. With HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER as order_per_bit, as intended, this would be (64G / 2M) / 8 == 4k. So, that's quite a difference. Also, this restricted the hugetlb_cma area to ((PAGE_SIZE << MAX_PAGE_ORDER) * 8) * PAGE_SIZE (e.g. 128G on x86) , since bitmap_alloc uses normal page allocation, and is thus restricted by MAX_PAGE_ORDER. Specifying anything about that would fail the CMA initialization. So, correctly pass in the order instead. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240404162515.527802-2-fvdl@xxxxxxxxxx Fixes: cf11e85fc08c ("mm: hugetlb: optionally allocate gigantic hugepages using cma") Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fvdl@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c index 228c886c46c1..5dc3f5ea3a2e 100644 --- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -7794,9 +7794,9 @@ void __init hugetlb_cma_reserve(int order) * huge page demotion. */ res = cma_declare_contiguous_nid(0, size, 0, - PAGE_SIZE << HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER, - 0, false, name, - &hugetlb_cma[nid], nid); + PAGE_SIZE << HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER, + HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER, false, name, + &hugetlb_cma[nid], nid); if (res) { pr_warn("hugetlb_cma: reservation failed: err %d, node %d", res, nid);
