Re: 6.6.y: cifs broken since 6.6.23 writing big files with vers=1.0 and 2.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 04:44:27PM +0200, Thomas Voegtle wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 09:20:33AM +0200, Thomas Voegtle wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > a machine booted with Linux 6.6.23 up to 6.6.32:
> > > 
> > > writing /dev/zero with dd on a mounted cifs share with vers=1.0 or
> > > vers=2.0 slows down drastically in my setup after writing approx. 46GB of
> > > data.
> > > 
> > > The whole machine gets unresponsive as it was under very high IO load. It
> > > pings but opening a new ssh session needs too much time. I can stop the dd
> > > (ctrl-c) and after a few minutes the machine is fine again.
> > > 
> > > cifs with vers=3.1.1 seems to be fine with 6.6.32.
> > > Linux 6.10-rc3 is fine with vers=1.0 and vers=2.0.
> > > 
> > > Bisected down to:
> > > 
> > > cifs-fix-writeback-data-corruption.patch
> > > which is:
> > > Upstream commit f3dc1bdb6b0b0693562c7c54a6c28bafa608ba3c
> > > and
> > > linux-stable commit e45deec35bf7f1f4f992a707b2d04a8c162f2240
> > > 
> > > Reverting this patch on 6.6.32 fixes the problem for me.
> > 
> > Odd, that commit is kind of needed :(
> > 
> > Is there some later commit that resolves the issue here that we should
> > pick up for the stable trees?
> > 
> 
> Hope this helps:
> 
> Linux 6.9.4 is broken in the same way and so is 6.9.0.

How about Linus's tree?

thnanks,

greg k-h




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux