On Sun, Jun 09, 2024 at 11:21:55PM -0700, Ron Economos wrote: > On 6/9/24 12:34 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.33 release. > > > There are 741 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > 6.6 seems to have build problem on risc-v: > > > > CC kernel/locking/qrwlock.o > > 690 > > CC lib/bug.o > > 691 > > CC block/blk-rq-qos.o > > 692 > > arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c: In function 'suspend_save_csrs': > > 693 > > arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c:14:66: error: 'RISCV_ISA_EXT_XLINUXENVCFG' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI'? > > 694 > > 14 | if (riscv_cpu_has_extension_unlikely(smp_processor_id(), RISCV_ISA_EXT_XLINUXENVCFG)) > > 695 > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > 696 > > | RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI > > 697 > > arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c:14:66: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > > 698 > > CC io_uring/io-wq.o > > 699 > > arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c: In function 'suspend_restore_csrs': > > 700 > > arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.c:37:66: error: 'RISCV_ISA_EXT_XLINUXENVCFG' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI'? > > 701 > > 37 | if (riscv_cpu_has_extension_unlikely(smp_processor_id(), RISCV_ISA_EXT_XLINUXENVCFG)) > > 702 > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > 703 > > | RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI > > 704 > > make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:243: arch/riscv/kernel/suspend.o] Error 1 > > 705 > > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:480: arch/riscv/kernel] Error 2 > > 706 > > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:480: arch/riscv] Error 2 > > 707 > > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > 708 > > CC lib/buildid.o > > 709 > > > > https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/jobs/7053222239 > > https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/pipelines/1324369118 > > > > No problems detected on 6.8-stable and 6.1-stable. > > > > Best regards, > > Pavel > > I'm seeing the same thing here. Somehow some extra patches got slipped in > between rc1 and rc2. The new patches for RISC-V are: > > Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@xxxxxxxxxx> > riscv: Save/restore envcfg CSR during CPU suspend > > commit 88b55a586b87994a33e0285c9e8881485e9b77ea > > Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@xxxxxxxxxx> > riscv: Fix enabling cbo.zero when running in M-mode > > commit 8c6e096cf527d65e693bfbf00aa6791149c58552 > > The first patch "riscv: Save/restore envcfg CSR during CPU suspend" causes > the build failure. > > Yes, these were added because they were marked as fixes for other commits in the series. I'll unwind them all now as something is going wrong... greg k-h
