[PATCH 6.6 461/744] udf: Remove GFP_NOFS allocation in udf_expand_file_adinicb()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.6-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 38f8af2a7191e5da21c557210d810c6d0d34f6c4 ]

udf_expand_file_adinicb() is called under inode->i_rwsem and
mapping->invalidate_lock. i_rwsem is safe wrt fs reclaim,
invalidate_lock on this inode is safe as well (we hold inode reference
so reclaim will not touch it, furthermore even lockdep should not
complain as invalidate_lock is acquired from udf_evict_inode() only when
truncating inode which should not happen from fs reclaim).

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Stable-dep-of: db6754090a4f ("udf: Convert udf_expand_file_adinicb() to use a folio")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/udf/inode.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/udf/inode.c b/fs/udf/inode.c
index a17a6184cc39e..7f7610dddcba1 100644
--- a/fs/udf/inode.c
+++ b/fs/udf/inode.c
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ int udf_expand_file_adinicb(struct inode *inode)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, 0, GFP_NOFS);
+	page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!page)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux