6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Portia Stephens <portia.stephens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit fa7bd98f3c8b33fb68c6b2bc69cff32b63db69f8 ]
There is a compile warning because a NULL pointer check was added before
a struct was declared. This moves the NULL pointer check to after the
struct is declared and moves the struct assignment to after the NULL
pointer check.
Fixes: f661017e6d32 ("cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: add check for cpufreq_cpu_get's return value")
Signed-off-by: Portia Stephens <portia.stephens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c
index 1a1857b0a6f48..ea8438550b490 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c
@@ -481,9 +481,12 @@ static bool brcm_avs_is_firmware_loaded(struct private_data *priv)
static unsigned int brcm_avs_cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+ struct private_data *priv;
+
if (!policy)
return 0;
- struct private_data *priv = policy->driver_data;
+
+ priv = policy->driver_data;
cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
--
2.43.0
