[PATCH 6.6 106/744] rcu-tasks: Fix show_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread buffer overflow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.6-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@xxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit cc5645fddb0ce28492b15520306d092730dffa48 ]

There is a possibility of buffer overflow in
show_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread() if counters, passed
to sprintf() are huge. Counter numbers, needed for this
are unrealistically high, but buffer overflow is still
possible.

Use snprintf() with buffer size instead of sprintf().

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Fixes: edf3775f0ad6 ("rcu-tasks: Add count for idle tasks on offline CPUs")
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index 65e000ca332cc..305e960c08ac5 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -1938,7 +1938,7 @@ void show_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread(void)
 {
 	char buf[64];
 
-	sprintf(buf, "N%lu h:%lu/%lu/%lu",
+	snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "N%lu h:%lu/%lu/%lu",
 		data_race(n_trc_holdouts),
 		data_race(n_heavy_reader_ofl_updates),
 		data_race(n_heavy_reader_updates),
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux