6.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Hsin-Te Yuan <yuanhsinte@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit a85ed162f0efcfdd664954414a05d1d560cc95dc ]
For DSP_A, data is a BCK cycle behind LRCK trigger edge. For DSP_B, this
delay doesn't exist. Fix the delay configuration to match the standard.
Fixes: 52fcd65414abfc ("ASoC: mediatek: mt8192: support tdm in platform driver")
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Te Yuan <yuanhsinte@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240509-8192-tdm-v1-1-530b54645763@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-tdm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-tdm.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-tdm.c
index 9ce06821c7d0f..49440db370af0 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-tdm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8192/mt8192-dai-tdm.c
@@ -566,10 +566,10 @@ static int mtk_dai_tdm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
tdm_con |= 1 << DELAY_DATA_SFT;
tdm_con |= get_tdm_lrck_width(format) << LRCK_TDM_WIDTH_SFT;
} else if (tdm_priv->tdm_out_mode == TDM_OUT_DSP_A) {
- tdm_con |= 0 << DELAY_DATA_SFT;
+ tdm_con |= 1 << DELAY_DATA_SFT;
tdm_con |= 0 << LRCK_TDM_WIDTH_SFT;
} else if (tdm_priv->tdm_out_mode == TDM_OUT_DSP_B) {
- tdm_con |= 1 << DELAY_DATA_SFT;
+ tdm_con |= 0 << DELAY_DATA_SFT;
tdm_con |= 0 << LRCK_TDM_WIDTH_SFT;
}
--
2.43.0
