On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 10:21 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 9:10 AM <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The hard-coded metrics is wrongly calculated on the hybrid machine.
> >
> > $ perf stat -e cycles,instructions -a sleep 1
> >
> > Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
> >
> > 18,205,487 cpu_atom/cycles/
> > 9,733,603 cpu_core/cycles/
> > 9,423,111 cpu_atom/instructions/ # 0.52 insn per cycle
> > 4,268,965 cpu_core/instructions/ # 0.23 insn per cycle
> >
> > The insn per cycle for cpu_core should be 4,268,965 / 9,733,603 = 0.44.
> >
> > When finding the metric events, the find_stat() doesn't take the PMU
> > type into account. The cpu_atom/cycles/ is wrongly used to calculate
> > the IPC of the cpu_core.
> >
> > Fixes: 0a57b910807a ("perf stat: Use counts rather than saved_value")
> > Reported-by: "Khalil, Amiri" <amiri.khalil@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c b/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c
> > index 3466aa952442..4d0edc061f1a 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c
> > @@ -176,6 +176,10 @@ static double find_stat(const struct evsel *evsel, int aggr_idx, enum stat_type
> > if (type != evsel__stat_type(cur))
> > continue;
> >
> > + /* Ignore if not the PMU we're looking for. */
> > + if (evsel->pmu != cur->pmu)
> > + continue;
Hmm.. Don't some metrics need events from different PMU?
Like cycles per sec or branch instructions per sec..
Thanks,
Namhyung
> > +
> > aggr = &cur->stats->aggr[aggr_idx];
> > if (type == STAT_NSECS)
> > return aggr->counts.val;
> > --
> > 2.35.1
> >
