On 01/07/2015 02:02 PM, John Stultz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 10:12:19AM -0800, John Stultz wrote: >>> From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> An unvalidated user input is multiplied by a constant, which can result in >>> an undefined behaviour for large values. While this is validated later, >>> we should avoid triggering undefined behaviour. >>> >>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> [jstultz: include trivial milisecond->microsecond correction noticed >>> by Andy] >>> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> include/linux/time.h | 13 +++++++++++++ >>> kernel/time/time.c | 4 ++++ >>> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+) >> >> <formletter> >> >> This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the >> stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt >> for how to do this properly. >> >> </formletter> > > Hrm. I'm not quite sure which rule I'm running afoul here. > > Does this seem too much like a theoretical issue and not like enough > of a "oh, that's not good" issue? I suspect it's something more like "Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" vs "Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", but not really sure. Thanks, Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html