6.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 4125269bb9b22e1d8cdf4412c81be8074dbc61ca ]
Use complete parentheses to ensure that macro expansion does
not produce unexpected results.
Fixes: a25d13cbe816 ("RDMA/hns: Add the interfaces to support multi hop addressing for the contexts in hip08")
Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Junxian Huang <huangjunxian6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412091616.370789-10-huangjunxian6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.h | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.h
index 7d23d3c51da46..fea6d7d508b60 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.h
@@ -61,16 +61,16 @@ enum {
(sizeof(struct scatterlist) + sizeof(void *)))
#define check_whether_bt_num_3(type, hop_num) \
- (type < HEM_TYPE_MTT && hop_num == 2)
+ ((type) < HEM_TYPE_MTT && (hop_num) == 2)
#define check_whether_bt_num_2(type, hop_num) \
- ((type < HEM_TYPE_MTT && hop_num == 1) || \
- (type >= HEM_TYPE_MTT && hop_num == 2))
+ (((type) < HEM_TYPE_MTT && (hop_num) == 1) || \
+ ((type) >= HEM_TYPE_MTT && (hop_num) == 2))
#define check_whether_bt_num_1(type, hop_num) \
- ((type < HEM_TYPE_MTT && hop_num == HNS_ROCE_HOP_NUM_0) || \
- (type >= HEM_TYPE_MTT && hop_num == 1) || \
- (type >= HEM_TYPE_MTT && hop_num == HNS_ROCE_HOP_NUM_0))
+ (((type) < HEM_TYPE_MTT && (hop_num) == HNS_ROCE_HOP_NUM_0) || \
+ ((type) >= HEM_TYPE_MTT && (hop_num) == 1) || \
+ ((type) >= HEM_TYPE_MTT && (hop_num) == HNS_ROCE_HOP_NUM_0))
struct hns_roce_hem_chunk {
struct list_head list;
--
2.43.0
