6.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 1f2a74b41ea8b902687eb97c4e7e3f558801865b ]
r10 is a special register that is not under BPF program's control and is
always effectively precise. The rest of precision logic assumes that
only r0-r9 SCALAR registers are marked as precise, so prevent r10 from
being marked precise.
This can happen due to signed cast instruction allowing to do something
like `r0 = (s8)r10;`, which later, if r0 needs to be precise, would lead
to an attempt to mark r10 as precise.
Prevent this with an extra check during instruction backtracking.
Fixes: 8100928c8814 ("bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns")
Reported-by: syzbot+148110ee7cf72f39f33e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240404214536.3551295-1-andrii@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index cb7ad1f795e18..f3faee45753e8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -3615,7 +3615,8 @@ static int backtrack_insn(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int idx, int subseq_idx,
* sreg needs precision before this insn
*/
bt_clear_reg(bt, dreg);
- bt_set_reg(bt, sreg);
+ if (sreg != BPF_REG_FP)
+ bt_set_reg(bt, sreg);
} else {
/* dreg = K
* dreg needs precision after this insn.
@@ -3631,7 +3632,8 @@ static int backtrack_insn(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int idx, int subseq_idx,
* both dreg and sreg need precision
* before this insn
*/
- bt_set_reg(bt, sreg);
+ if (sreg != BPF_REG_FP)
+ bt_set_reg(bt, sreg);
} /* else dreg += K
* dreg still needs precision before this insn
*/
--
2.43.0
