On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 06:21:08PM +0800, shaozhengchao wrote: > > > On 2024/5/25 17:42, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 05:33:00PM +0800, shaozhengchao wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 2024/5/23 19:34, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 11:05:52AM +0800, Zhengchao Shao wrote: > > > > > There's no "pernet" variable in the struct hashinfo. The "pernet" variable > > > > > is introduced from v6.1-rc1. Revert pre-patch and post-patch. > > > > > > > > I do not understand, why are these reverts needed? > > > > > > > > How does the code currently build if there is no variable here? > > > > > > > > confused, > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > Hi greg: > > > If only the first patch is merged, compilation will fail. > > > There's no "pernet" variable in the struct hashinfo. > > > > But both patches are merged together here. Does the released kernel > > versions fail to build somehow? > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > Work well, as I know. Ok, then why send these reverts? Are they needed, or are they not needed? And if needed, why? still confused, greg k-h
