6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Steve French <stfrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit f72d96507640835726d4f5ba26c1c11acbe1bc97 ]
Minor cleanup of style issues found by checkpatch
Reviewed-by: Bharath SM <bharathsm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/smb/client/sess.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/smb/client/sess.c b/fs/smb/client/sess.c
index 70a53dde83eec..09bb30610a901 100644
--- a/fs/smb/client/sess.c
+++ b/fs/smb/client/sess.c
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ cifs_chan_clear_in_reconnect(struct cifs_ses *ses,
struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
{
unsigned int chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, server);
+
if (chan_index == CIFS_INVAL_CHAN_INDEX)
return;
@@ -119,6 +120,7 @@ cifs_chan_in_reconnect(struct cifs_ses *ses,
struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
{
unsigned int chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, server);
+
if (chan_index == CIFS_INVAL_CHAN_INDEX)
return true; /* err on the safer side */
@@ -130,6 +132,7 @@ cifs_chan_set_need_reconnect(struct cifs_ses *ses,
struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
{
unsigned int chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, server);
+
if (chan_index == CIFS_INVAL_CHAN_INDEX)
return;
@@ -143,6 +146,7 @@ cifs_chan_clear_need_reconnect(struct cifs_ses *ses,
struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
{
unsigned int chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, server);
+
if (chan_index == CIFS_INVAL_CHAN_INDEX)
return;
@@ -156,6 +160,7 @@ cifs_chan_needs_reconnect(struct cifs_ses *ses,
struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
{
unsigned int chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, server);
+
if (chan_index == CIFS_INVAL_CHAN_INDEX)
return true; /* err on the safer side */
@@ -167,6 +172,7 @@ cifs_chan_is_iface_active(struct cifs_ses *ses,
struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
{
unsigned int chan_index = cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, server);
+
if (chan_index == CIFS_INVAL_CHAN_INDEX)
return true; /* err on the safer side */
@@ -677,8 +683,7 @@ static __u32 cifs_ssetup_hdr(struct cifs_ses *ses,
/* Now no need to set SMBFLG_CASELESS or obsolete CANONICAL PATH */
- /* BB verify whether signing required on neg or just on auth frame
- (and NTLM case) */
+ /* BB verify whether signing required on neg or just auth frame (and NTLM case) */
capabilities = CAP_LARGE_FILES | CAP_NT_SMBS | CAP_LEVEL_II_OPLOCKS |
CAP_LARGE_WRITE_X | CAP_LARGE_READ_X;
@@ -735,8 +740,10 @@ static void unicode_domain_string(char **pbcc_area, struct cifs_ses *ses,
/* copy domain */
if (ses->domainName == NULL) {
- /* Sending null domain better than using a bogus domain name (as
- we did briefly in 2.6.18) since server will use its default */
+ /*
+ * Sending null domain better than using a bogus domain name (as
+ * we did briefly in 2.6.18) since server will use its default
+ */
*bcc_ptr = 0;
*(bcc_ptr+1) = 0;
bytes_ret = 0;
@@ -755,8 +762,7 @@ static void unicode_ssetup_strings(char **pbcc_area, struct cifs_ses *ses,
char *bcc_ptr = *pbcc_area;
int bytes_ret = 0;
- /* BB FIXME add check that strings total less
- than 335 or will need to send them as arrays */
+ /* BB FIXME add check that strings less than 335 or will need to send as arrays */
/* copy user */
if (ses->user_name == NULL) {
--
2.43.0
