Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/243] 6.1.91-rc2 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/243] 6.1.91-rc2 review
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 09:20:48 -0700
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, patches@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx, shuah@xxxxxxxxxx, patches@xxxxxxxxxxxx, lkft-triage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pavel@xxxxxxx, jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx, f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx, sudipm.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxx, srw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rwarsow@xxxxxx, conor@xxxxxxxxxx, allen.lkml@xxxxxxxxx, Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Doug Berger <opendmb@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <39483cfc-4345-4fbd-87c2-9d618c6fdbc6@sirena.org.uk>

On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 09:17, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>     A bisect claims that "net: bcmgenet:
> synchronize EXT_RGMII_OOB_CTRL access" is the first commit that breaks,
> I'm not seeing issues with other stables.

That's d85cf67a3396 ("net: bcmgenet: synchronize EXT_RGMII_OOB_CTRL
access") upstream. Is upstream ok?

                 Linus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/243] 6.1.91-rc2 review
  - From: Guenter Roeck
- Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/243] 6.1.91-rc2 review
  - From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/243] 6.1.91-rc2 review
  - From: Florian Fainelli

References:
- [PATCH 6.1 000/243] 6.1.91-rc2 review
  - From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
- Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/243] 6.1.91-rc2 review
  - From: Mark Brown

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/243] 6.1.91-rc2 review
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/168] 5.15.159-rc2 review
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/243] 6.1.91-rc2 review
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/243] 6.1.91-rc2 review
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]