Patch "Btrfs: fix loop writing of async reclaim" has been added to the 3.17-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    Btrfs: fix loop writing of async reclaim

to the 3.17-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     btrfs-fix-loop-writing-of-async-reclaim.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.17 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From 25ce459c1af138f95a3fd318461193397ebb825b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:58:50 +0800
Subject: Btrfs: fix loop writing of async reclaim

From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 25ce459c1af138f95a3fd318461193397ebb825b upstream.

One of my tests shows that when we really don't have space to reclaim via
flush_space and also run out of space, this async reclaim work loops on adding
itself into the workqueue and keeps writing something to disk according to
iostat's results, and these writes mainly comes from commit_transaction which
writes super_block.  This's unacceptable as it can be bad to disks, especially
memeory storages.

This adds a check to avoid the above situation.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>
Cc: "Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |   17 ++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -4343,11 +4343,21 @@ static inline int need_do_async_reclaim(
 }
 
 static int btrfs_need_do_async_reclaim(struct btrfs_space_info *space_info,
-				       struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
+				       struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
+				       int flush_state)
 {
 	u64 used;
 
 	spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
+	/*
+	 * We run out of space and have not got any free space via flush_space,
+	 * so don't bother doing async reclaim.
+	 */
+	if (flush_state > COMMIT_TRANS && space_info->full) {
+		spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	used = space_info->bytes_used + space_info->bytes_reserved +
 	       space_info->bytes_pinned + space_info->bytes_readonly +
 	       space_info->bytes_may_use;
@@ -4380,11 +4390,12 @@ static void btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata
 		flush_space(fs_info->fs_root, space_info, to_reclaim,
 			    to_reclaim, flush_state);
 		flush_state++;
-		if (!btrfs_need_do_async_reclaim(space_info, fs_info))
+		if (!btrfs_need_do_async_reclaim(space_info, fs_info,
+						 flush_state))
 			return;
 	} while (flush_state <= COMMIT_TRANS);
 
-	if (btrfs_need_do_async_reclaim(space_info, fs_info))
+	if (btrfs_need_do_async_reclaim(space_info, fs_info, flush_state))
 		queue_work(system_unbound_wq, work);
 }
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx are

queue-3.17/btrfs-fix-loop-writing-of-async-reclaim.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]