Hi Carlos,
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:46:03PM +0000, Carlos Llamas wrote:
> For atomic_sub_and_test() the @i parameter is the value to subtract, not
> add. Fix the kerneldoc comment accordingly.
>
> Fixes: ad8110706f38 ("locking/atomic: scripts: generate kerneldoc comments")
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h b/include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h
> index debd487fe971..12b558c05384 100644
> --- a/include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h
> +++ b/include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h
> @@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ atomic_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(atomic_t *v, int *old, int new)
>
> /**
> * atomic_sub_and_test() - atomic subtract and test if zero with full ordering
> - * @i: int value to add
> + * @i: int value to subtract
> * @v: pointer to atomic_t
Whoops; sorry about that.
The atomic headers are generated, and this kerneldoc comment is
generated from the template in scripts/atomic/kerneldoc/sub_and_test
You'll need to modify that then run:
sh scripts/atomic/gen-atomics.sh
... to regenerate all the affected instances of ${atomic}_sub_and_test()
Thanks,
Mark.
