[PATCH 6.1 143/236] perf unwind-libdw: Handle JIT-generated DSOs properly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit c966d23a351a33f8a977fd7efbb6f467132f7383 ]

Usually DSOs are mapped from the beginning of the file, so the base
address of the DSO can be calculated by map->start - map->pgoff.

However, JIT DSOs which are generated by `perf inject -j`, are mapped
only the code segment.  This makes unwind-libdw code confusing and
rejects processing unwinds in the JIT DSOs.  It should use the map
start address as base for them to fix the confusion.

Fixes: 1fe627da30331024 ("perf unwind: Take pgoff into account when reporting elf to libdwfl")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Fangrui Song <maskray@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pablo Galindo <pablogsal@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231212070547.612536-3-namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c
index 94aa40f6e3482..9a7bdc0e14cc2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static int __report_module(struct addr_location *al, u64 ip,
 {
 	Dwfl_Module *mod;
 	struct dso *dso = NULL;
+	Dwarf_Addr base;
 	/*
 	 * Some callers will use al->sym, so we can't just use the
 	 * cheaper thread__find_map() here.
@@ -57,24 +58,36 @@ static int __report_module(struct addr_location *al, u64 ip,
 	if (!dso)
 		return 0;
 
+	/*
+	 * The generated JIT DSO files only map the code segment without
+	 * ELF headers.  Since JIT codes used to be packed in a memory
+	 * segment, calculating the base address using pgoff falls info
+	 * a different code in another DSO.  So just use the map->start
+	 * directly to pick the correct one.
+	 */
+	if (!strncmp(dso->long_name, "/tmp/jitted-", 12))
+		base = al->map->start;
+	else
+		base = al->map->start - al->map->pgoff;
+
 	mod = dwfl_addrmodule(ui->dwfl, ip);
 	if (mod) {
 		Dwarf_Addr s;
 
 		dwfl_module_info(mod, NULL, &s, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
-		if (s != al->map->start - al->map->pgoff)
-			mod = 0;
+		if (s != base)
+			mod = NULL;
 	}
 
 	if (!mod)
 		mod = dwfl_report_elf(ui->dwfl, dso->short_name, dso->long_name, -1,
-				      al->map->start - al->map->pgoff, false);
+				      base, false);
 	if (!mod) {
 		char filename[PATH_MAX];
 
 		if (dso__build_id_filename(dso, filename, sizeof(filename), false))
 			mod = dwfl_report_elf(ui->dwfl, dso->short_name, filename, -1,
-					      al->map->start - al->map->pgoff, false);
+					      base, false);
 	}
 
 	if (mod) {
-- 
2.43.0







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux