6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Li Nan <linan122@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 22d24a544b0d49bbcbd61c8c0eaf77d3c9297155 ] There is no check for overflow of 'start + len' in blk_ioctl_discard(). Hung task occurs if submit an discard ioctl with the following param: start = 0x80000000000ff000, len = 0x8000000000fff000; Add the overflow validation now. Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240329012319.2034550-1-linan666@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- block/ioctl.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c index d1d8e8391279a..68265f914c27b 100644 --- a/block/ioctl.c +++ b/block/ioctl.c @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int blk_ioctl_discard(struct block_device *bdev, blk_mode_t mode, unsigned long arg) { uint64_t range[2]; - uint64_t start, len; + uint64_t start, len, end; struct inode *inode = bdev->bd_inode; int err; @@ -110,7 +110,8 @@ static int blk_ioctl_discard(struct block_device *bdev, blk_mode_t mode, if (len & 511) return -EINVAL; - if (start + len > bdev_nr_bytes(bdev)) + if (check_add_overflow(start, len, &end) || + end > bdev_nr_bytes(bdev)) return -EINVAL; filemap_invalidate_lock(inode->i_mapping); -- 2.43.0
