With PCREL addressing, there is no kernel TOC. So, it is not setup in
prologue when PCREL addressing is used. But the number of instructions
to skip on a tail call was not adjusted accordingly. That resulted in
not so obvious failures while using tailcalls. 'tailcalls' selftest
crashed the system with the below call trace:
bpf_test_run+0xe8/0x3cc (unreliable)
bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x348/0x778
__sys_bpf+0xb04/0x2b00
sys_bpf+0x28/0x38
system_call_exception+0x168/0x340
system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec
Also, as bpf programs are always module addresses and a bpf helper in
general is a core kernel text address, using PC relative addressing
often fails with "out of range of pcrel address" error. Switch to
using kernel base for relative addressing to handle this better.
Fixes: 7e3a68be42e1 ("powerpc/64: vmlinux support building with PCREL addresing")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
* Changes in v4:
- Fix out of range errors by switching to kernelbase instead of PC
for relative addressing.
* Changes in v3:
- New patch to fix tailcall issues with PCREL addressing.
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 79f23974a320..4de08e35e284 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -202,7 +202,8 @@ void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
EMIT(PPC_RAW_BLR());
}
-static int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func)
+static int
+bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func)
{
unsigned long func_addr = func ? ppc_function_entry((void *)func) : 0;
long reladdr;
@@ -211,19 +212,20 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u
return -EINVAL;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_KERNEL_PCREL)) {
- reladdr = func_addr - CTX_NIA(ctx);
+ reladdr = func_addr - local_paca->kernelbase;
if (reladdr >= (long)SZ_8G || reladdr < -(long)SZ_8G) {
- pr_err("eBPF: address of %ps out of range of pcrel address.\n",
- (void *)func);
+ pr_err("eBPF: address of %ps out of range of 34-bit relative address.\n",
+ (void *)func);
return -ERANGE;
}
- /* pla r12,addr */
- EMIT(PPC_PREFIX_MLS | __PPC_PRFX_R(1) | IMM_H18(reladdr));
- EMIT(PPC_INST_PADDI | ___PPC_RT(_R12) | IMM_L(reladdr));
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(_R12));
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTR());
-
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LD(_R12, _R13, offsetof(struct paca_struct, kernelbase)));
+ /* Align for subsequent prefix instruction */
+ if (!IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)fimage + CTX_NIA(ctx), 8))
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_NOP());
+ /* paddi r12,r12,addr */
+ EMIT(PPC_PREFIX_MLS | __PPC_PRFX_R(0) | IMM_H18(reladdr));
+ EMIT(PPC_INST_PADDI | ___PPC_RT(_R12) | ___PPC_RA(_R12) | IMM_L(reladdr));
} else {
reladdr = func_addr - kernel_toc_addr();
if (reladdr > 0x7FFFFFFF || reladdr < -(0x80000000L)) {
@@ -233,9 +235,9 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u
EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDIS(_R12, _R2, PPC_HA(reladdr)));
EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(_R12, _R12, PPC_LO(reladdr)));
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(_R12));
- EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTRL());
}
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_MTCTR(_R12));
+ EMIT(PPC_RAW_BCTRL());
return 0;
}
@@ -285,7 +287,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o
int b2p_index = bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_3);
int bpf_tailcall_prologue_size = 8;
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2))
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_KERNEL_PCREL) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2))
bpf_tailcall_prologue_size += 4; /* skip past the toc load */
/*
@@ -993,7 +995,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct code
return ret;
if (func_addr_fixed)
- ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(image, ctx, func_addr);
+ ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(image, fimage, ctx, func_addr);
else
ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, fimage, ctx, func_addr);
--
2.44.0
