6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 96b0c1528ef41fe754f5d1378b1db6c098a2e33f ]
Add the missing mediatek,gce-client-reg property to the vppsys and
vdosys nodes to allow them to use the GCE. This prevents the "can't
parse gce-client-reg property" error from being printed and should
result in better performance.
Fixes: 6aa5b46d1755 ("arm64: dts: mt8195: Add vdosys and vppsys clock nodes")
Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240229-gce-client-reg-add-missing-mt8192-95-v1-2-b12c233a8a33@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
index 414cbe3451270..8f33b3226435a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195.dtsi
@@ -1492,6 +1492,7 @@
compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vppsys0";
reg = <0 0x14000000 0 0x1000>;
#clock-cells = <1>;
+ mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce1 SUBSYS_1400XXXX 0 0x1000>;
};
smi_sub_common_vpp0_vpp1_2x1: smi@14010000 {
@@ -1597,6 +1598,7 @@
compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-vppsys1";
reg = <0 0x14f00000 0 0x1000>;
#clock-cells = <1>;
+ mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce1 SUBSYS_14f0XXXX 0 0x1000>;
};
larb5: larb@14f02000 {
@@ -1982,6 +1984,7 @@
reg = <0 0x1c01a000 0 0x1000>;
mboxes = <&gce0 0 CMDQ_THR_PRIO_4>;
#clock-cells = <1>;
+ mediatek,gce-client-reg = <&gce0 SUBSYS_1c01XXXX 0xa000 0x1000>;
};
larb20: larb@1b010000 {
--
2.43.0
