5.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: John Stultz <jstultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit ed366de8ec89d4f960d66c85fc37d9de22f7bf6d upstream.
Building with clang results in the following warning:
posix_timers.c:69:6: warning: absolute value function 'abs' given an
argument of type 'long long' but has parameter of type 'int' which may
cause truncation of value [-Wabsolute-value]
if (abs(diff - DELAY * USECS_PER_SEC) > USECS_PER_SEC / 2) {
^
So switch to using llabs() instead.
Fixes: 0bc4b0cf1570 ("selftests: add basic posix timers selftests")
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240410232637.4135564-3-jstultz@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static int check_diff(struct timeval sta
diff = end.tv_usec - start.tv_usec;
diff += (end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec) * USECS_PER_SEC;
- if (abs(diff - DELAY * USECS_PER_SEC) > USECS_PER_SEC / 2) {
+ if (llabs(diff - DELAY * USECS_PER_SEC) > USECS_PER_SEC / 2) {
printf("Diff too high: %lld..", diff);
return -1;
}
