On 4/30/24 08:02, Baoquan He wrote: > On 04/29/24 at 12:52pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 11:40:16AM +0800, Mingzheng Xing wrote: >>> On 4/23/24 21:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 10:55:44PM +0800, Mingzheng Xing wrote: >>>>> On 4/19/24 21:58, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 08:26:07PM +0800, Mingzheng Xing wrote: >>>>>>> On 4/19/24 18:44, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 04:56:47PM +0800, Mingzheng Xing wrote: >>>>>>>>> This reverts commit 1d6cd2146c2b58bc91266db1d5d6a5f9632e14c0 which has been >>>>>>>>> merged into the mainline commit 39365395046f ("riscv: kdump: use generic >>>>>>>>> interface to simplify crashkernel reservation"), but the latter's series of >>>>>>>>> patches are not included in the 6.6 branch. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This will result in the loss of Crash kernel data in /proc/iomem, and kdump >>>>>>>>> loading the kernel will also cause an error: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ``` >>>>>>>>> Memory for crashkernel is not reserved >>>>>>>>> Please reserve memory by passing"crashkernel=Y@X" parameter to kernel >>>>>>>>> Then try to loading kdump kernel >>>>>>>>> ``` >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> After revert this patch, verify that it works properly on QEMU riscv. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/ZSiQRDGLZk7lpakE@MiWiFi-R3L-srv >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mingzheng Xing <xingmingzheng@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I do not understand, what branch is this for? Why have you not cc:ed >>>>>>>> any of the original developers here? Why does Linus's tree not have the >>>>>>>> same problem? And the first sentence above does not make much sense as >>>>>>>> a 6.6 change is merged into 6.7? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry, I'll try to explain it more clearly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This commit 1d6cd2146c2b ("riscv: kdump: fix crashkernel reserving problem >>>>>>> on RISC-V") should not have existed because this patch has been merged into >>>>>>> another larger patch [1]. Here is that complete series: >>>>>> >>>>>> What "larger patch"? It is in Linus's tree, so it's not part of >>>>>> something different, right? I'm confused. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi, Greg >>>>> >>>>> The email Cc:ed to author Chen Jiahao was bounced by the system, so maybe >>>>> we can wait for Baoquan He to confirm. >>>>> >>>>> This is indeed a bit confusing. The Fixes: tag in 1d6cd2146c2b58 is a false >>>>> reference. If I understand correctly, this is similar to the following >>>>> scenario: >>>>> >>>>> A Fixes B, B doesn't go into linus mainline. C contains A, C goes into linus >>>>> mainline 6.7, and C has more reconstruction code. but A goes into 6.6, so >>>>> it doesn't make sense for A to be in the mainline, and there's no C in 6.6 >>>>> but there's an A, thus resulting in an incomplete code that creates an error. >>>>> >>>>> The link I quoted [1] shows that Baoquan had expressed an opinion on this >>>>> at the time. >>>>> >>>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/ZSiQRDGLZk7lpakE@MiWiFi-R3L-srv [1] >>>> >>>> I'm sorry, but I still do not understand what I need to do here for a >>>> stable branch. Do I need to apply something? Revert something? >>>> Something else? >>> >>> Hi, Greg >>> >>> I saw Baoquan's reply in thread[1], thanks Baoquan for confirming. >>> >>> So I think the right thing to do would be just to REVERT the commit >>> 1d6cd2146c2b ("riscv: kdump: fix crashkernel reserving problem on RISC-V") >>> in the 6.6.y branch, which is exactly the patch I submitted. If I need to >>> make changes to my commit message, feel free to let me know and I'll post >>> the second version. >>> >>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/ZihbAYMOI4ylazpt@MiWiFi-R3L-srv [1] >> >> Can someone just send me a patch series showing EXACTLY what needs to be >> done here, as I am _still_ confused. > > I think Mingzheng's patch is good to apply in the 6.6.y stable branch. > > Hi Mingzheng, > > Can you resend this patch to Greg and stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and CC me? > I would like to Ack your patch, but can't find the original patch since > you didn't cc me. Hi, Greg, Baoquan, I sent the second version [1]. Thank you for taking the time. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20240430032403.19562-1-xingmingzheng@xxxxxxxxxxx [1] Best wishes Mingzheng > > Thanks > Baoquan