On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 03:32:55PM +0300, Vitaly Chikunov wrote: > Greg, > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:53:35PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 at 03:14, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.88 release. > > > There are 141 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 25 Apr 2024 21:38:28 +0000. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.88-rc1.gz > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > As Pavel reported, > > > > LKFT also found these regressions on 6.1. > > > > The arm build failed with gcc-13 and clang-17 on the Linux stable-rc > > linux.6.1.y branch. > > > > arm: > > * omap2plus_defconfig - failed > > * defconfig - failed > > > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I'm curious why v6.1.88 is still released nevertheless the reports of the > build regression on ARM32. Because I missed this, I thought I had dropped it already, sorry about that. I'll go do a new release with this commit reverted. thanks, greg k-h
