5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 283454c8a123072e5c386a5a2b5fc576aa455b6f ]
When we call recv() for AF_UNIX socket, we first peek one skb and
calls manage_oob() to check if the skb is sent with MSG_OOB.
However, when we fetch the next (and the following) skb, manage_oob()
is not called now, leading a wrong behaviour.
Let's say a socket send()s "hello" with MSG_OOB and the peer tries
to recv() 5 bytes with MSG_PEEK. Here, we should get only "hell"
without 'o', but actually not:
>>> from socket import *
>>> c1, c2 = socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM)
>>> c1.send(b'hello', MSG_OOB)
5
>>> c2.recv(5, MSG_PEEK)
b'hello'
The first skb fills 4 bytes, and the next skb is peeked but not
properly checked by manage_oob().
Let's move up the again label to call manage_oob() for evry skb.
With this patch:
>>> from socket import *
>>> c1, c2 = socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM)
>>> c1.send(b'hello', MSG_OOB)
5
>>> c2.recv(5, MSG_PEEK)
b'hell'
Fixes: 314001f0bf92 ("af_unix: Add OOB support")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240410171016.7621-2-kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 628d97c195a7e..e2a2e22d210f6 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -2644,6 +2644,7 @@ static int unix_stream_read_generic(struct unix_stream_read_state *state,
last = skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
last_len = last ? last->len : 0;
+again:
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AF_UNIX_OOB)
if (skb) {
skb = manage_oob(skb, sk, flags, copied);
@@ -2655,7 +2656,6 @@ static int unix_stream_read_generic(struct unix_stream_read_state *state,
}
}
#endif
-again:
if (skb == NULL) {
if (copied >= target)
goto unlock;
--
2.43.0
