6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alexey Izbyshev <izbyshev@xxxxxxxxx>
Commit 978e5c19dfefc271e5550efba92fcef0d3f62864 upstream.
This bug was introduced in commit 950e79dd7313 ("io_uring: minor
io_cqring_wait() optimization"), which was made in preparation for
adc8682ec690 ("io_uring: Add support for napi_busy_poll"). The latter
got reverted in cb3182167325 ("Revert "io_uring: Add support for
napi_busy_poll""), so simply undo the former as well.
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 950e79dd7313 ("io_uring: minor io_cqring_wait() optimization")
Signed-off-by: Alexey Izbyshev <izbyshev@xxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240405125551.237142-1-izbyshev@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
io_uring/io_uring.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -2426,6 +2426,14 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring
return 0;
} while (ret > 0);
+ if (uts) {
+ struct timespec64 ts;
+
+ if (get_timespec64(&ts, uts))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ timeout = ktime_add_ns(timespec64_to_ktime(ts), ktime_get_ns());
+ }
+
if (sig) {
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
if (in_compat_syscall())
@@ -2439,14 +2447,6 @@ static int io_cqring_wait(struct io_ring
return ret;
}
- if (uts) {
- struct timespec64 ts;
-
- if (get_timespec64(&ts, uts))
- return -EFAULT;
- timeout = ktime_add_ns(timespec64_to_ktime(ts), ktime_get_ns());
- }
-
init_waitqueue_func_entry(&iowq.wq, io_wake_function);
iowq.wq.private = current;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iowq.wq.entry);
