> According to the ACPI that I have access to, this is not correct - the
> Speaker ID is on index 2 not index 1.
> Index 1 has a reference to the interrupt line. Therefore this should be:
>
> { "17AA386E", 2, EXTERNAL, { CS35L41_LEFT, CS35L41_RIGHT, 0, 0 }, 0, 2, -1, 0, 0, 0 },
Sorry, but I'm unable to retrieve the speaker ID index from my BIOS.
Please tell me how to check it, thanks.
I've tried using `spkid_gpio_index = 2`, but haven't noticed any changes.
> The reason for any issue you see may be
> because you have assigned the speaker id for the interrupt gpio in ACPI
> as mentioned above.
Despite changing `spkid_gpio_index` to 2, it hasn't worked with `generic_dsd_config`.
The journal logs show:
```log
kernel: Serial bus multi instantiate pseudo device driver CSC3551:00: Instantiated 2 I2C devices.
kernel: cs35l41-hda i2c-CSC3551:00-cs35l41-hda.0: Adding DSD properties for 17AA386E
kernel: cs35l41-hda i2c-CSC3551:00-cs35l41-hda.0: Using extra _DSD properties, bypassing _DSD in ACPI
kernel: cs35l41-hda i2c-CSC3551:00-cs35l41-hda.0: Cirrus Logic CS35L41 (35a40), Revision: B2
kernel: cs35l41-hda i2c-CSC3551:00-cs35l41-hda.1: Adding DSD properties for 17AA386E
kernel: cs35l41-hda i2c-CSC3551:00-cs35l41-hda.1: Using extra _DSD properties, bypassing _DSD in ACPI
kernel: cs35l41-hda i2c-CSC3551:00-cs35l41-hda.1: Reset line busy, assuming shared reset
kernel: genirq: Flags mismatch irq 58. 00002088 (cs35l41 IRQ1 Controller) vs. 00002088 (cs35l41 IRQ1 Controller)
kernel: cs35l41_hda_probe+0x94b/0x9d0 [snd_hda_scodec_cs35l41 5706d5af6d4d4abb9d294b49d5cd4cc8a51aad9d]
kernel: ? __pfx_cs35l41_i2c_driver_init+0x10/0x10 [snd_hda_scodec_cs35l41_i2c 8858b01ad506c8ac36ad9a656c7cb71d39d6ec09]
kernel: cs35l41-hda i2c-CSC3551:00-cs35l41-hda.1: Failed to request IRQ 58 for cs35l41 IRQ1 Controller: -16
kernel: cs35l41-hda: probe of i2c-CSC3551:00-cs35l41-hda.1 failed with error -16
```
I believe this error might be caused by the configuration of the same IRQ multiple times.
Additionally, I checked the Cirrus SmartAMP driver on Windows, which appears to use only one IRQ (ID 58) on my device.
Therefore, I don't believe there is a need to configure two IRQs on my device.
The message `Flags mismatch 00002088 vs. 00002088` is confusing.
Further investigation reveals that the following check in `__setup_irq` failed:
```c
if (irqd_trigger_type_was_set(&desc->irq_data)) {
oldtype = irqd_get_trigger_type(&desc->irq_data);
} else {
oldtype = new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK;
irqd_set_trigger_type(&desc->irq_data, oldtype);
}
if (!((old->flags & new->flags) & IRQF_SHARED) ||
(oldtype != (new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK)))
goto mismatch;
```
While the previous request used flags `0x00002088 = IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW`,
the `oldtype` was actually `IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING` (0x1) rather than `IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW` (0x8), leading to the mismatch.
I am new to Linux Kernel, not sure if this is expected behavior or a bug for `IRQF_SHARED`.
Ideally, a clearer message may be provided to facilitate understanding.
Sorry to bother you if I make some foolish mistakes.
