On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 02:42:16PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 04:59:24AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > > > Revert "s390/ism: fix receive message buffer allocation" > > > > to the 6.8-stable tree which can be found at: > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary > > > > The filename of the patch is: > > revert-s390-ism-fix-receive-message-buffer-allocatio.patch > > and it can be found in the queue-6.8 subdirectory. > > > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, > > please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. > > > > > > > > commit 8568beeed3944bd4bf4c3683993a9df6ae53fbb7 > > Author: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue Apr 9 13:37:53 2024 +0200 > > > > Revert "s390/ism: fix receive message buffer allocation" > > > > [ Upstream commit d51dc8dd6ab6f93a894ff8b38d3b8d02c98eb9fb ] > > > > This reverts commit 58effa3476536215530c9ec4910ffc981613b413. > > Review was not finished on this patch. So it's not ready for > > upstreaming. > > > > Signed-off-by: Gerd Bayer <gbayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409113753.2181368-1-gbayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Fixes: 58effa347653 ("s390/ism: fix receive message buffer allocation") > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I'm not sure if it makes sense to add and revert a patch within a > single stable queue (the same applies to 6.6). It might make sense to > drop both patches. It makes it easier for us to track that this was applied, otherwise our scripts get confused and keeps trying to add it back :) thanks, greg k-h
