5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit d2399501c2c081eac703ca9597ceb83c7875a537 ]
Commit 0499a78369ad ("ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase
supported CPUs to 512") changed the handling of cpumasks on ARM 64bit,
what resulted in the strange issues and warnings during cpufreq-dt
initialization on some big.LITTLE platforms.
This was caused by mixing OPPs between big and LITTLE cores, because
OPP-sharing information between big and LITTLE cores is computed on
cpumask, which in turn was not zeroed on allocation. Fix this by
switching to zalloc_cpumask_var() call.
Fixes: dc279ac6e5b4 ("cpufreq: dt: Refactor initialization to handle probe deferral properly")
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v5.10+
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter (Ampere) <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
index e363ae04aac62..44cc596ca0a5e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int dt_cpufreq_early_init(struct device *dev, int cpu)
if (!priv)
return -ENOMEM;
- if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&priv->cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
+ if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&priv->cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
return -ENOMEM;
priv->cpu_dev = cpu_dev;
--
2.43.0
