5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 95009ae904b1e9dca8db6f649f2d7c18a6e42c75 ]
The lockdep assert is added by commit a448af25becf ("md/raid10: remove
rcu protection to access rdev from conf") in print_conf(). And I didn't
notice that dm-raid is calling "pers->hot_add_disk" without holding
'reconfig_mutex'.
"pers->hot_add_disk" read and write many fields that is protected by
'reconfig_mutex', and raid_resume() already grab the lock in other
contex. Hence fix this problem by protecting "pers->host_add_disk"
with the lock.
Fixes: 9092c02d9435 ("DM RAID: Add ability to restore transiently failed devices on resume")
Fixes: a448af25becf ("md/raid10: remove rcu protection to access rdev from conf")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v6.7+
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240305072306.2562024-10-yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
index e523ecdf947f4..99995b1804b32 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
@@ -4019,7 +4019,9 @@ static void raid_resume(struct dm_target *ti)
* Take this opportunity to check whether any failed
* devices are reachable again.
*/
+ mddev_lock_nointr(mddev);
attempt_restore_of_faulty_devices(rs);
+ mddev_unlock(mddev);
}
if (test_and_clear_bit(RT_FLAG_RS_SUSPENDED, &rs->runtime_flags)) {
--
2.43.0
