On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Monday, December 15, 2014 09:48:19 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> CONFIG_GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 disappeared with commit bbcf071969b20f
>>> ("cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_dt'") and some
>>> defconfigs are still using it instead of the new one.
>>>
>>> Use the renamed CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT generic driver.
>>>
>>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.18
>>> Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> OK, so who should be applying this?
>>
>
> Normally, we take these defconfig changes through the arm-soc tree, and
> I think that should continue, otherwise we'll be bound to have conflicts.
>
> Note all the pull requests for this merge window are already sent, but
> I'll queue this up in arm-soc/fixes so it can make it during the
> v3.19-rc cycle.
Any chance of the following being queued for the .19 window or do we
wait to go through Tony?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5484401/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html