Am 16.12.2014 um 03:05 schrieb Andy Lutomirski: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Eric W. Biederman > <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Will people please test these patches with their container project? >> >> These changes break container userspace (hopefully in a minimal way) if >> I could have that confirmed by testing I would really appreciate it. I >> really don't want to send out a bug fix that accidentally breaks >> userspace again. >> >> The only issue sort of under discussion is if there is a better name for >> /proc/<pid>/setgroups, and the name of the file will not affect the >> functionality of the patchset. >> >> With the code reviewed and written in simple obviously correct, easily >> reviewable ways I am hoping/planning to send this to Linus ASAP. > > > I tested this with Sandstorm. It breaks as is and it works if I add > the setgroups thing. > > Tested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # breaks things as designed :( > > I still don't like the name "setgroups". I agree that the name is not optimal. But I don't have a counterproposal as my naming skills are miserable. Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html