On 11.04.24 07:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:25:04AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> Some developers deliberately steer clear of 'Fixes:' tags to prevent >> changes from being backported semi-automatically by the stable team. >> That somewhat undermines the reason for the existence of the Fixes: tag, >> hence point out there is an alternative to reach the same effect. >> >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/dfd87673-c581-4b4b-b37a-1cf5c817240d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ >> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst | 6 ++++++ >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst >> index 7bb16d42a51833..ebd57cb9277f7b 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst >> +++ b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst >> @@ -117,6 +117,12 @@ comment to pass arbitrary or predefined notes: >> Note, such tagging is unnecessary if the stable team can derive the >> appropriate versions from Fixes: tags. >> >> + * Prevent semi-automatic backporting of changes carrying a 'Fixes:' tag: >> + >> + .. code-block:: none >> + >> + Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # no semi-automatic backport > > I do not understand, why are you saying "cc: stable" here if you do NOT > want it backported? Because the only alternative the developers have to make the stable team not pick a single patch[1] is to deliberately omit a Fixes: tag even if the patch normally should have one. Like it was done here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1712226175.git.antony.antony@xxxxxxxxxxx/ And that somehow felt wrong to me, as discussed earlier in https://lore.kernel.org/all/dfd87673-c581-4b4b-b37a-1cf5c817240d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [1] e.g. if they don't have or want their whole subsystem marked as 'ignore for the AUTOSEL and the "Fixes tag only" tools' https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/ignore_list > And what do you mean by "semi-automatic"? E.g. 'ignore for the AUTOSEL and the "Fixes tag only" tools'. That was the best term I came up with. Ciao, Thorsten
