6.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx> commit d91ef1e1b55f730bee8ce286b02b7bdccbc42973 upstream. Jianguo Wu reported another bind() regression introduced by bhash2. Calling bind() for the following 3 addresses on the same port, the 3rd one should fail but now succeeds. 1. 0.0.0.0 or ::ffff:0.0.0.0 2. [::] w/ IPV6_V6ONLY 3. IPv4 non-wildcard address or v4-mapped-v6 non-wildcard address The first two bind() create tb2 like this: bhash2 -> tb2(:: w/ IPV6_V6ONLY) -> tb2(0.0.0.0) The 3rd bind() will match with the IPv6 only wildcard address bucket in inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any(), however, no conflicting socket exists in the bucket. So, inet_bhash2_conflict() will returns false, and thus, inet_bhash2_addr_any_conflict() returns false consequently. As a result, the 3rd bind() bypasses conflict check, which should be done against the IPv4 wildcard address bucket. So, in inet_bhash2_addr_any_conflict(), we must iterate over all buckets. Note that we cannot add ipv6_only flag for inet_bind2_bucket as it would confuse the following patetrn. 1. [::] w/ SO_REUSE{ADDR,PORT} and IPV6_V6ONLY 2. [::] w/ SO_REUSE{ADDR,PORT} 3. IPv4 non-wildcard address or v4-mapped-v6 non-wildcard address The first bind() would create a bucket with ipv6_only flag true, the second bind() would add the [::] socket into the same bucket, and the third bind() could succeed based on the wrong assumption that ipv6_only bucket would not conflict with v4(-mapped-v6) address. Fixes: 28044fc1d495 ("net: Add a bhash2 table hashed by port and address") Diagnosed-by: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo106@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240326204251.51301-3-kuniyu@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) --- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c @@ -294,6 +294,7 @@ static bool inet_bhash2_addr_any_conflic struct sock_reuseport *reuseport_cb; struct inet_bind_hashbucket *head2; struct inet_bind2_bucket *tb2; + bool conflict = false; bool reuseport_cb_ok; rcu_read_lock(); @@ -306,18 +307,20 @@ static bool inet_bhash2_addr_any_conflic spin_lock(&head2->lock); - inet_bind_bucket_for_each(tb2, &head2->chain) - if (inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any(tb2, net, port, l3mdev, sk)) - break; - - if (tb2 && inet_bhash2_conflict(sk, tb2, uid, relax, reuseport_cb_ok, - reuseport_ok)) { - spin_unlock(&head2->lock); - return true; + inet_bind_bucket_for_each(tb2, &head2->chain) { + if (!inet_bind2_bucket_match_addr_any(tb2, net, port, l3mdev, sk)) + continue; + + if (!inet_bhash2_conflict(sk, tb2, uid, relax, reuseport_cb_ok, reuseport_ok)) + continue; + + conflict = true; + break; } spin_unlock(&head2->lock); - return false; + + return conflict; } /*