6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@xxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 40e2710860e57411ab57a1529c5a2748abbe8a19 ] ACPICA commit 9061cd9aa131205657c811a52a9f8325a040c6c9 Errors in acpi_evaluate_object() can lead to incorrect state of buffer. This can lead to access to data in previously ACPI_FREEd buffer and secondary ACPI_FREE to the same buffer later. Handle errors in acpi_evaluate_object the same way it is done earlier with acpi_ns_handle_to_pathname. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/9061cd9a Fixes: 5fd033288a86 ("ACPICA: debugger: add command to dump all fields of particular subtype") Signed-off-by: Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c index b91155ea9c343..c9131259f717b 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dbnames.c @@ -550,8 +550,12 @@ acpi_db_walk_for_fields(acpi_handle obj_handle, ACPI_FREE(buffer.pointer); buffer.length = ACPI_ALLOCATE_LOCAL_BUFFER; - acpi_evaluate_object(obj_handle, NULL, NULL, &buffer); - + status = acpi_evaluate_object(obj_handle, NULL, NULL, &buffer); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) { + acpi_os_printf("Could Not evaluate object %p\n", + obj_handle); + return (AE_OK); + } /* * Since this is a field unit, surround the output in braces */ -- 2.43.0
